Be Careful What You Wish For – Bloggers Lament
Welcome back!
Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it, with a whole lot more than you ever bargained for.
Countless people covet making the Front Page of Digg — it’s many a blogger’s dream. Should you have a post on your blog that makes front page, be prepared for more than you’re likely aware for the cause and effect. Photo The Bex
Blogger’s Lament — Digg Effect
This is not to brag — this is my lament. And before I go any further, PLEASE — DO NOT Digg this, I BEG you. The Digg Effect is typically the term coined when a site crashes due to server overload once your article or post has hit front page. But there is so much more to deal with should your site actually survive the Digg Effect that you need to be made aware of before you venture down that path — bandwidth consumption, stampede of traffic and what you’ll be subject to from it, bandwidth theft, comments and pingbacks, the post Digg effect, site hosting, and how to keep your site afloat after the battering you and your blog receives.
One of my posts had been submitted to Digg unbeknownst to me. A side note to those that do this — please be kind enough contact the blog owner if there is a means of contact to give them the heads up to be prepared for the possible onslaught.
The post must have been near to hitting front page because my site suddenly began behaving sluggish. I received a comment which alerted me that my post had been dugg. Not long afterwards I received a call from my webmaster who is also my host. We had to act fast or the server would fail, as it was at 99% of consumption of bandwidth. There were over 1500 visitors per minute, and it only had 62 Diggs. In other words, it doesn’t take much to put your site in jeopardy of crashing.
My host couldn’t afford the possibilities of a repeat, as his server is also host to numerous websites. To add injury to the predicament I’d had a computer crash and quickly worked to get my husband’s laptop set up for my own use with requirements for my blogging. After moving to a new host we put the post back up.
Within one day of functioning without glitches I began updating the post with new entries. The site was behaving sluggish. Once again I received a comment to the post alerting me it had been submitted again. This had been made possible because I had to obtain a new domain in the process of moving hosts, as the blog is built into the back end of our business website.
Now the REAL fun begins, surviving the Digg Effect. You may be thrilled with the rush initially, but trust me, the thrill doesn’t last for long. Here’s what you’ll be faced with…
The Digg Effect
Bandwidth Consumption
If your server survives the Digg Effect you’re going to get hit by massive bandwidth consumption. Consider this — every time your page is called to open your page consumes however many bytes the page consists of for bandwidth use. The Digg count for those who’ve dugg it doesn’t come close to indicating how many hits your page is receiving. And if they click to other pages you have even more bandwidth use. Photo McNeney
We survived the Digg effect, but for the first day alone I had already used 46% of my allotted space of 1 terabyte, which is 1000G. That’s a LOT. Then there was the post digg effect the next day which consumed even more.



Photo left – 1st post dugg, center – post Digg effect, right – 2nd post dugg.
2 days later another of my posts had been dugg but this time the person had the courtesy to inform me after they had done it. Kudos to the individual with polite manners! But I hadn’t expected it would be one that would make front page. Was I ever wrong. The second hit to front page consumed another 40% of my allotted monthly bandwidth.
The Stampede
Be prepared for a ride like you’ve never experienced. I liken it to the Running of the Bulls. Hoards of people will come crashing through your site in sheer madness bringing with it utter chaos.

Photo dpstyles
If you’re unaware that your page has been dugg and you’re not there to protect your site, you may suffer horrific damage from the ambush. Fortunately I was working on my blog and there to deal with the attacks, but let me tell you, it wasn’t a picnic. After hours and hours of dealing with the issues I felt like I’d been either trampled on and left to die or been hit by a cement truck.
Bandwidth Theft
You can definitely count on the fact that you’ll be subject to bandwidth theft by people hotlinking to your images, even from the comments in the Digg itself. Once sites, blogs and forums begin writing about your post, there’ll be even more hotlinking, but you won’t have the time to investigate who the culprits are for the time being to put a stop to it, as you’re too busy dealing with everything going on at your site.
I tried using a code for the blog that claimed to prevent people from hotlinking to images from posts, but my webmaster couldn’t get it to work. If anyone knows of a plugin that works, I’d really appreciate the info for it for myself and to help others as well.
Comments and Pingbacks
Never let it be said that Diggers don’t leave comments. But for the few that leave kind ones, there are countless more that behave as if they’re in the comments section on the Digg site, which is a whole world unto itself.
You’ll be subject to some rude, lewd, and crude remarks to both you and those that have left polite ones. There’s no rhyme or reason to much of it, and it’s difficult for me to comprehend why certain people do it. They don’t know you and they don’t care about you or the damage they create — in fact, it seems to be their modus operandi. Trolls.
Not only will you be busy deleting the hate comments, but there will be a borage of pingbacks from others linking to your post that you’ll possibly want to delete. My webmaster informed me that the comments and pingbacks were also consuming considerable bandwidth.
It’s no small wonder why many large sites have commenting turned off. I had the option to do this, but it would also affect the entire site. If you elect to switch off comments, you’ll be subject to a surge of pingbacks the moment they’re turned back on. If you turn off the option for pingbacks you won’t have quick access to the information as to who is linking to you unless you have analytics installed, which I don’t. Yes, I know I SHOULD but it’s always the issue of finding the ever elusive factor of time, so don’t beat me up for it.
The Post Digg Effect
I’ve never actually heard this as an actual term, and I hereby dub thee. After surviving the Digg Effect you will have numerous considerations and decisions to make for hosting, domains, and how to keep your site afloat. Photo Lynn Morag
Hosting
You’ll need to decide to either stay with your current host or find a new one that can handle the Digg Effect. I had no option but to move, and it’s no small task. Be certain that you do your homework to make a wise choice, because you don’t want to have to repeat the process.
A friend was bumped from 3 hosts within 2 weeks after being hit by front page diggs. Even though claims were made of their capabilities, he was punted without notice and not refunded any of portion his 1 year’s hosting fees he’d paid for upfront. I’ve moved to Media Temple upon his recommendations, which hasn’t failed me yet for this first week. I’ve also been receiving daily reports to alert me to cautionary measures I need to take from daily consumption due to these surges of traffic.
In the process of switching hosts I’ve had to obtain a new domain and domain name. The effect of this was losing all of the precious backlinks and Technorati faves I’ve received to this point. Sniff. (Wipes nose on sleeve.)
The Tornado After the Storm
Well you’ve survived the digg effect after dusting off your shoulders. The calm after the storm – WRONG. You’re in the eye of the tornado.
What’s good for front page for Digg is good for a crack at being the one to quickly post to other social sites such as Reddit, Delicious, Plime, Fark, and the works before someone else does. Don’t forget the forums either. You’re now subject to full bore hurricane force — even larger surges of traffic from the collective sites, comments and a litany of pingbacks. The one positive note to the comments is that it’s rare to see the flaming you received from the first flood of traffic. Photo Extreme WX Photographer
Loss of your Posts
The only alternative I had to stop the onslaught was to take my pages down. The reports estimated that if I continued with the way I was currently operating, I was going to exceed my allotted monthly bandwidth, with an estimated bill of $1,500 US. GACK!
I haven’t monetized my site — I do this purely for fun, to express my creativity, and the pleasure of the people I’ve met along the way that have become new friends. In less than 24 hours of deleting the first post that had been dugg, I was forced to also delete the second post that hit front page. This is a tragic turn of event to be forced into if you’ve created a popular post that you’ve placed a lot of work into.
Keeping Your Site Afloat
Now you need to make some very quick decisions how to keep your site afloat. Much of your bandwidth has already been consumed for the entire month, adding insult to injury. You need to optimize your site if you’ve never done so before. My front page had been consuming 20% of my bandwidth. Being relatively new to blogging myself, I’m going to discuss some measures for you to take. They may be old hat to those with experience, but solid advice to those that are new such as I.
Images
I’m a very graphic person and like to put some life into my posts with photos. The larger they are the more impact I receive. I can say this first hand based on comments and links to posts — of course subject of the post is also a factor. If you’re going to use images, create the smallest file size possible by using your image editor to ‘Save For Web’. Merely saving with a low quality isn’t enough. By taking the low quality images I’d saved and converting them to Save For Web, I was able to reduce each image by up to 70% of its original file size.
Number of Posts on Home Page
Consider that each time your front page is called up, it consumes the bandwidth for each post you have appearing on your home page. I’ve switched from 10 posts to 5. My webmaster is quite adamant that I reduce the number to 1. I refuse to do this as it reminds me of certain unsavory blogs I’ve seen at times.
Do I reduce it even further to 3 posts for front page? What say you? I’d love to hear your thoughts. I fear that if I don’t have a varied offering to new visitors by offering enough page views they may exit stage left quickly and not return.
The More Feature
Once again, my webmaster is strongly voicing his opinion to turn on the More feature to provide only a small snippet of the post — 1 post on front page with the More feature. Horror of horrors! I’d look like a spam blog!
I’ve read mixed opinions about using the More feature. Some very popular sites use it, but personally, I don’t feel a lesser site for traffic that’s not so well known can afford to utilize this feature.
RSS subscribers — which a growing number of readers are using — are forced to leave their reader to read your entire post. This either annoys some mildly or angers others to the point of cancelling their subscriptions. I don’t want to take those risks, but I’d love to hear other’s first hand experience or opinion on the topic.
Widgets
The more widgets you have on your home page, the more bandwidth you’re consuming each time a visitor clicks on your front page, not to mention each post. Trim it down to your essentials. If you like the widgets that display visitors, decide on which are most important to you, and how many avatars you really need to appear on your widgets.
Not only are you consuming unnecessary bandwidth (that you may be forced to pay extra for), the longer it takes your front page and individual pages to load. If it takes too long you’ve lost potential readers.
Final Verdict
Don’t get me wrong, it may appear that I’m slamming Digg, but I’m actually addicted to the site. I just don’t wish to endure the effects of making front page. I have removed my Digg widget so it’s not as effortless to submit my pages.
While there may be some trolls on the site and those that like to create flaming wars, there are just as many or more that are decent and desirable ‘friends.’
Based on the timing of the comments received, very few negative ones were made from those coming from the other social sites. It’s not very difficult to figure out which users are from Digg even though they’ve used other aliases either.
The quality of my recent posts has suffered due to not being able to spare the time to write in my usual style while I rode the tidal wave over the past 5 days.
I’m not certain that I will be able to repost the pages I’ve had to delete. I may experiment by adding one of them once again and keep a close watch in case it has to be permanently removed, but it won’t be during this month’s hosting, as I can’t afford to have my site taken down entirely for the period as a result. The repercussions would be fierce.
If you’ve monetized your site and have a large enough popularity that your site income can cover the costs, then you obviously don’t share the concerns I have. But if your site isn’t monetized, you need to seriously consider all or some of what has been offered here.
If others have further advice, hints, or tips, please do share, and be as detailed in your advice as possible for those of us unfamiliar with the processes. But remember, be NICE or this little puppy isn’t playing with you.
And finally, be careful what you wish for …
Tags:blogs digg Digg effect networking sites social websites










EEEK!! One can only imagine the chaos that ensues with being hit like that. I was, and still am, on another social site who emailed me that one particular post was overloading their server, so I went off to have apeek and the numbers were just rolling up all the time. It was an out-dated post so I renamed it but subsequently removed it, the problem being caused by one of the keywords!! I even tried a redirect to a more recent post, but it made no difference. I had forgotten about that one and whilst reading your article it reminded me, um!!
Personally, I wouldn’t favour the ‘Read more’ or having 1 or 3 posts on the homepage. 5 looks good and shouldn’t consume excessive amounts of memory or bandwidth. That is just my humble opinion, and I’m sure others will voice their own views.
I know just what you mean about the ‘Read more’, just think, you could change the font colour….maybe a nice spammy pink….what do you think? Hmm thought so hahaha
RSS subscribers may well not read the full article because of the ‘Read more’. Is it worth the risk? I say not, but again, that is just my own personal point of view.
Hope you are surviving. Though it’s funny you still have 15 “share this post on social networks” icons.. even though most will not bring as much traffic as Digg, they still will if someone uses them.
@Colin: You can configure “read more” to appear on the website and not on the RSS. That is what I do.
Thanks for your advice Colin.
Haha, yes, pink text, and maybe some purple to go along with it.
Thanks Ilker. Gees, I hadn’t realized there were so many until you pointed it out to me. I can select which ones I want to appear, but don’t want to eliminate all of them altogether, as my webmaster went thru a geat ordeal recently to get them working. I will trim it down tho.
Stumble can send a fair amount of traffic, but I’ve never received as much from the others. It was an accumulation of a lot of them in the Post Digg Effect after the initial front page on Digg that got really bad. Had it not hit FP on Digg, I don’t think many of them would have picked up on it.
And the comments from the other sites were civil and friendly. It was all of the nonstop pingbacks coming thru, several per minute that was making it impossible to keep up with anything.
Thanks for the advice on the More feature, I wasn’t aware that you could switch it off for RSS only. You have what *I* consider to be a very healthy sized readership. It would be intersting to know if it would be even higher if it was completely disabled.
So that leads to another question, what others feel or have for experience with using the More feature for front page for visitors arriving directly to the site, and disabled for RSS.
What an education you got! Now I can’t get that Disney song out of my head, “When you wish upon a star [...]” It sounds like your “wish” really became on real nightmare. I’m so very sorry yet I must agree to how life unfolds many of its impromptu lessons and at the most inopportune times, doesn’t it?
The great news in this lesson is that as long as we’re still learning, then there is hope for a better way of life and toward living it well. Congratulations, dahlink, and to you let me lift me cup and say, “To Life!”
*Hugs*
Thanks Saboma. To life!
I sympathise Deborah….the woes of being popular….:(
I think the 5 posts work……..and I prefer to read the entire post too……
and I’m with Saboma…..big cheers to you !!!!!!
Thanks Kim, 2 pro’s for 5 posts and no More feature. Cheers back atchya!
Yo, Deborah.
- 2-3 posts, full size. You are writing long posts, made longer coz of pics, so scroll bar is allready usually just few millimeters height
Also, you can post the pics as regular size, while they are hosted somewhere else … Yahoo geocities for example, is free …
)
- As you allready said (and done), make loaded pics smaller size. Make them thumbnail, pointed to somewhere else. You are gonna think to flikr, I`m gonna think to yahoo pics …
- use a SLOW computer (150-400 Mhz) and load several times (not one after one, some 5-15 mins pause) your blog and pay attention to status bar, what is loading hard/slow, it will be there printed. This will take few days and lot of loadings on different times to get a reliable result. Loose what slow down page loading.
- me, I never used, but I hear from somebody that “burry it” button on digg site works like a charm.
- Digg site folows the link. If you notice a certain post got to many (dangerous number) of duggs, go to admin area and CHANGE THE POST NAME ! Also set a 404 page, with some small sized text to let peoples know they f*** your bandtwith … or just a simple plain google search in middle ..
And so on …
Thanks Valentin. I did try using Flickr, but for some reason it wouldn’t show the image, only the text link to it. I’m sadly techy challenged
But I’ll still try working on it, as I have a pro account with them.
Haha, yes, I know about the ‘bury’ button on Digg, and it does work. But sites can be banned from Digg that receive buries. I don’t want to ever hit FP again, but I don’t want to have the reputation of having a banned site there … you’re looked upon as a spammer or snake
I’ll have to talk to my webmaster about the 404 page, as he’s the one who has the control on that end. The blog is built into the back end of our business website, which he takes care of for us. If I want plugins installed or whatever, I tell him what I want, where I want it, and how
- open a browser page.
- type mail.yahoo.com
- there you`ll have a login form – below is asking if you wanna register – register.
- use less – general details (other for job, me and he for name/second name snd so on.
- get the yahoo free email address. logout.
- type in your browser geocities.com, on top youl see a welcome guest, sign in “manage” > “File Manager” > Open file manager > in right, “upload files”
- upload your pics
- go to blog admin area, the place you want to show a pic
- type :
img src=”http://www.geocities.com/your_yahoo_id/name_of_your_pic” border=”0″ width=”width of your pic” alt=”short description of pic”
Add after last ”
Forget flikr
)
Thanks Valentin, I’ll give that a shot
I’m HTML challaneged and rely on my WP for coding, so hopefully I’ll get it right. I need examples of exact coding with brackets and all, haha. ‘file name’ I understand, just switching it out.
Dam, tags are out …
I`ll try again
http://five4all.com/tools/image.html
Use this as often you want
I’ve heard a little bit about this from you, but not as thoroughly and completely explained as here in this post! Oh man, what a nightmare you’ve been through. I don’t think this happens on Blogger, does it? Of course, I’ve never had the bulls run on my pages, so I don’t know.
I like the way your site looks now, and maybe it’s time to think about monetizing your site just so that you can easily pay some of these extra expenses. Ah, the curses of popularity.
As for Digg, I don’t mess with it…those trolls! Yuk!
Well you’re only alotted so much bandwidth on Blogger. experiencing front page on Digg would likely bring your blog down, at least temporarily. It’s not uncommon as well to receive error messages when clicking on the link to a post that the site has exceeded their bandwidth, and doesn’t display.
That’s when Digg Mirror comes into play that captures the post before a site goes down.
I don’t know Kuanyin, I’ve preached for so long that I haven’t wanted to monetize the site I’d feel like a hypocrit
Yeah, that makes sense. Destroy your hosting with Digg. Online tips
)
Thanks Valetin, that info is very helpful. It seems that i have to set up a *blog* on Geocities to do this. The Yahoo account and email I already have.
Oom, that’s definitely not what I want to do, to be banned from Digg just to prevent my posts from getting dugg. I enjoy the site far too much to do that
wow!! what a post.. i actually read the whole thing!
I had no idea getting traffic so quickly could cause such a problem… I knew it could cause problems with your site crashing, but i didn’t realize it could affect your posts, etc. Good to know.. thanks for the advice!
Thanks for taking the time to read, and glad that it was helpful to you
It seems that the majority of sites that don’t crash and survive the Digg effect are commercial and media sites. Unless you have hosting that can pull you through it, you may not go through all of what my site was exposed to.
Hi Deborah,
I don’t know if you’re willing to monkey around with your .htaccess file or not, but this is what I do when I see a bunch of Digg referrals via Clicky.
I have two .htaccess files on my PC. When I spot a possible digg effect underway, I copy the one that contains this to my root at the web host:
RewriteCond %{HTTP_USER_AGENT} !^CoralWebPrx
RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} !(^|&)coral-no-serve$
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://([^/]+\.)?digg\.com
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://([^/]+\.)?plime\.com [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://([^/]+\.)?reddit\.com [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://([^/]+\.)?slashdot\.org [OR]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} ^http://([^/]+\.)?slashdot\.com
RewriteRule ^(.*)?$ http://www.untwistedvortex.com.nyud.net:8080/$1 [R,L]
It works by redirecting all the traffic to the coral cache. Of course, you have to be watching to make it happen. It’s a shame that web hosts can’t get in there and make the changes for us when they spot it. They could take the site offline for a few minutes, plug the code into your .htaccess file and then bring it back online.
Thanks for sharing this RT. I don’t have control of that aspect, but I’m going to forward this to my webmaster to keep on hand and have at the ready should we need it. All it will take is a quick call to him, and he can take action. Much appreciated
Those are unusual tips!!!
Thank you for sharing!
Glad you were able to get some some useful information Carol
Congratulations for surviving the Digg Effect. I enjoyed your post!
It makes me think more than twice of promoting my website after reading your post. Kudos for a great post, really was an eye opener to me.